Why Double-Blind Review Is Preferable for Scholarly Journals
نویسندگان
چکیده
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. pISSN 1011-8934 eISSN 1598-6357 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.10.1438 • J Korean Med Sci 2014; 29: 1438
منابع مشابه
Double Blind Peer-Review in Humanities
Pre-publication peer-review forms the basis of how scholarly journals assess whether an article is suitable for publication. It is of paramount importance that the process is perceived to be fair, robust, and free of bias. One of the key methods for achieving this goals is using a blind-reviewing method. Up until now, Humanities has used a single blind peer-review approach, where the reviewer i...
متن کاملUptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics
Background Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. The aims of this study are to analyse the demographics of corresponding authors choosing double blind peer review, and to identify differences in the editorial outcome of manuscripts depending on their review model. Methods Data includes 128,454 manuscripts receive...
متن کاملScholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous ...
متن کاملDouble-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.
Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer identity are revealed, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals. However, in 2001, double-blind review was introduced by the journal Behavioral Ecology. Following this policy change, there was a significant increase in female first-authored papers, a pattern not observed in a very similar journal that provides reviewers ...
متن کاملIdentification of Author and Reviewer from Single and Double Blind Paper
Research leads to the development of science and technology and hence it leads to the betterment of humankind also. Journals and Conferences provide a platform to receive large number of research papers for publications and presentations before the expert and peer-level scientific community. In order to assure quality of such papers, they are also sent to reviewers for their comments. In order ...
متن کامل